This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bouckaert, G. Articles by van de Walle, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction as Indicators of ‘Good Governance’: Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

Steven van de Walle

Until recently, public administration mainly used so-called ‘hard indicators’, such as resources and outputs, to monitor performance. Increased attention on accountability and issues around impacts and outcomes have stimulated the introduction of ‘soft’ indicators—e.g. citizen and user satisfaction targets. Moreover, there is increased demand for information on performance in relation to ‘governance’ as a whole, including ‘quality of life’ indicators. Politicians, journalists and citizens increasingly express their worries about a decreasing level of trust in government and the detrimental effects this has on government and on the cohesion of society—they appear to assume that more trust and more satisfaction equal better governance. Increasing the quality of governance will thus also lead to citizens who are more satisfied and more trusting. This article shows that current attempts to measure trust and satisfaction in government are misleading if they claim to be measuring good governance for two reasons. First, satisfaction is difficult to measure and very service-specific. Second, trust in government is easier to measure but its linkages with good governance are far from clear. Even when trust in government can be measured, it is not at all clear whether changes in the level of trust are actually influenced by government-related factors. We suggest, finally, the hypothesis that trust could be insufficient but necessarily part of a set of indicators which are unnecessary but sufficient for good governance.

International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 69, No. 3, 329-343 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0020852303693003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Holzer, E. Charbonneau, and Y. Kim Mapping the terrain of public service quality improvement: twenty-five years of trends and practices in the United States International Review of Administrative Sciences, September 1, 2009; 75(3): 403 - 418. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Hendriks Contextualizing the Dutch drop in political trust: connecting underlying factors International Review of Administrative Sciences, September 1, 2009; 75(3): 473 - 491. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Schalk, R. Torenvlied, and J. Allen Network Embeddedness and Public Agency Performance: The Strength of Strong Ties in Dutch Higher Education J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 31, 2009; (2009) mup018v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. G. Van Ryzin Citizen perceptions of road smoothness: evidence from New York with implications for comparative performance measurement International Review of Administrative Sciences, December 1, 2008; 74(4): 575 - 588. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Choudhury Trust in Administration: An Integrative Approach to Optimal Trust Administration Society, October 1, 2008; 40(6): 586 - 620. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Bovens and A. Wille Deciphering the Dutch drop: ten explanations for decreasing political trust in The Netherlands International Review of Administrative Sciences, June 1, 2008; 74(2): 283 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Houlihan and A. Preece Independence and Accountability: The Case of the Drug Free Sport Directorate, the UK's National Anti-Doping Organisation Public Policy and Administration, October 1, 2007; 22(4): 381 - 402. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Heintzman and B. Marson People, service and trust: is there a public sector service value chain? International Review of Administrative Sciences, December 1, 2005; 71(4): 549 - 575. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Bovaird Public governance: balancing stakeholder power in a network society International Review of Administrative Sciences, June 1, 2005; 71(2): 217 - 228. [Abstract] [PDF]