This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Balasooriya, A. F. Articles by Coghill, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Ownership, competition and regulation under privatization policy: the Sri Lankan experience

Department of Management of Monash University

Quamrul Alam

Department of Management of Monash University

Ken Coghill

Department of Management of Monash University

In response to the global shift from command-based economies to market economies, Sri Lanka liberalized its economy in 1977. Liberalization includes three main components, i.e. institutional reforms, removal of barriers to market entry, and creation of proper regulatory regimes. Privatization as one of the strategies under liberalization, however, became the prominent policy adopted in the second wave of liberalization that took place in Sri Lanka in the mid-1980s. This was aimed at not only reducing the fiscal and administrative burdens of a large public enterprise sector, but also to stimulate private sector development and to inspire greater government accountability. The fundamentals for successful implementation were, however, the change in ownership, the designing of policies to stimulate competition and changes in the regulatory regime with capable institutions. This article explores and analyses the extent to which the prevailing socio-political culture of the country has influenced these three dimensions of the reforms that have taken place in the public utility sectors in Sri Lanka. It argues that if any of the three dimensions of privatization — that is, ownership, competition and regulation — are not taken into serious consideration, the expected outcomes would not be met. The arguments are built up under the same three pillars of privatization using primary and secondary data. It also highlights the importance of putting equal emphasis on all three dimensions of liberalization instead of pure organizational reforms. However, successful implementation is also subject to the availability of domestic conditions that are supportive of reforms.

Points for practitioners

• Reforms in the public utility sectors in Sri Lanka since the early 1980s with special reference to privatization policy have been dealt with.

• The importance of paying equal attention to all three dimensions, i.e. ownership, competition and regulation, is highlighted.

• The consequences of privatization of two industries, i.e. gas industry and telecommunications, are discussed in detail.

• Sri Lanka has responded to the demands for reforms without creating a legal and institutional framework and ignoring domestic conditions.

Key Words: developing countries • domestic conditions • institutional reforms • liberalization • political interest • public utilities

References

• Akram, T. (2004) `A Theory of Ineffective Privatization: The Case of Bangladesh — Part I', Problems and Perspectives in Management 1: 20—30.
• Al-Obaidan, A.M. (2002) `Efficiency Effect of Privatization in the Developing Countries', Applied Economics 34: 111—17.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Azmat, F. and Coghill, K. (2005) `Good Governance and Market-based Reforms: A Study of Bangladesh', International Review of Administrative Sciences 71(4): 625—38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Balasooriya, A., Alam, Q. and Coghill, K. (2006a) `The Effectiveness of the Telecommunications Regulatory Regime: The Case of Sri Lanka Telecom', Public Administration and Development 26: 386—93.
• Balasooriya, A., Alam, Q. and Coghill, K. (2006b). `Market-based Reforms: An Empirical Analysis of Privatization in Sri Lanka', paper presented at the ANZAM Conference, 6—9 December, Central Queensland University, Queensland, Australia.
• Baldwin, R. and Cave, M. (1999) Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice. New York, Oxford University Press.
• Banerjee, S.G. and Munger, M.C. (2004) `Move to Markets? An Empirical Analysis of Privatization in Developing Countries', Journal of International Development 16(2): 213—40.[CrossRef]
• Basu, P.K. (1994) `Demystifying Privatization in Developing Countries ', The International Journal of Public Sector Management 7(3): 44—55.[CrossRef]
• Brinkerhoff, D.W. and Brinkerhoff, J.M. (2002) `Governance Reforms and Failed States: Challenges and Implications', International Review of Administrative Sciences 68(4): 511—31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Brune, N., Garrett, G. and Kogut, B. (2004) `The International Monetary Fund and the Global Spread of Privatization', IMF Staff Papers, pp. 195—219. Washington, DC: 51(2) archived at www.imf.org/External/Pubs/FT/staffp/2004/02/brune.htm.[Web of Science]
• Cbsl (2005) Annual Report of Central Bank of Sri Lanka. Colombo: Central Bank of Sri Lanka.
• Cbsl (2006a) Recent Economic Developments: Highlights of 2006 and Prospects for 2007. Colombo: Central Bank of Sri Lanka.
• Cbsl (2006b) Annual Report of Central Bank of Sri Lanka. Colombo: Central Bank of Sri Lanka.
• Commander, S., Dutz, M. and Stern, N. (1999) `Restructuring in Transition Economies: Ownership, Competition and Regulation', Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics Conference Paper. World Bank, Washington DC.
• Cook, P. and Kirkpatrick, C. (1995) `Privatization Policy and Performance', in P. Cook and C. Kirkpatrick (eds) Privatization Policy and Performance: International Perspectives, pp. 1—27. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.
• Cook, P., Kirkpatrick, C., Minogue, M. and Parker, D. (2004) `Competition, Regulation and Regulatory Governance: An Overview', in P. Cook, C. Kirkpatrick, M. Minogue and D. Parker (eds) Leading Issues in Competition, Regulation and Development, pp. 3—35. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Craig, J. (2000) `Evaluating Privatization in Zambia: A Tale of Two Processes', Review of African Political Economy 27(85): 357—66.[CrossRef]
• De Soysa, T. (2002) `The Market for LPG in Sri Lanka: Is it a Case for Regulatory Intervention?', in M. Knight-John (ed.) Competition Policy and Utility Regulation: The Sri Lankan Experience, pp. 119—40. Colombo: Law and Society Trust.
• Dunham, D. and Jayasuriya, S. (2001) `Liberalization and Political Decay: Sri Lanka's Journey from Welfare State to a Brutalized Society', Working Paper Series. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.
• Embuldeniya, D.K. (2000) `Economic Reforms and the Corporate Sector in Sri Lanka', Contemporary South Asia 9(2): 165—79.[CrossRef]
• Gnos, C. and Rochon, L.P. (2004) `What is Next for the Washington Consensus? The Fifteenth Anniversary 1989—2004', Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 27(2): 187—93.[Web of Science]
• Henisz, W.J. (1999) `The Institutions and Governance of Economic Reform: Theoretical Extensions and Applications', Public Management 1(3): 349—71.[CrossRef]
• Hodge, G.A. (2000) Privatization: An International Review of Performance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Hughes, O.E. (2003) Public Management and Administration: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• ILO (2000) Privatization in South Asia: Minimizing Negative Social Effects through Restructuring. Geneva: Publications Office, International Labour Organization.
• Indraratna, S. (2004) `Consumer Affairs Authority Act in the Overall Context of Competition Policy', in S. Kelegama (ed.) Economic Policy in Sri Lanka: Issues and Debates, pp. 349—62. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• Jackson, P.M. and Price, C. (1994) Privatization and Regulation: A Review of the Issues. New York: Longman Publishing.
• Jayasuriya, S. and Knight-John, M. (2000) `Sri Lanka's Telecommunications Industry: From Privatization to Anti Competition?', Working Paper Series. Melbourne: La Trobe University.
• Jayawardena, L. (1997) `Sri Lanka: Reforming Public Administration', The Report on Governance: Promoting Sound Development Management, archived at www.adb.org/Documents/Conference/Governance/chap7.pdf.
• Johnson, A.L. (2003) `Evaluating Privatization of Telecommunications to Foster Economic Growth: Argentina Revisited', Law Technology 36(4): 1—22.
• Kelegama, S. (1993) Privatization in Sri Lanka: The Experience during the Early Years of Implementation. Colombo: Sri Lanka Economic Association.
• Kelegama, S. (2002) `Competition Policy in Sri Lanka', in M. Knight-John Competition Policy and Utility Regulation: The Sri Lankan Experience, pp. 26—43. Colombo: Law and Society Trust.
• Kikeri, S. and Nellis, J. (2002) `Privatization in Competitive Sectors: The Record to Date', Policy Research Working Paper Series, archived at www.-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2002/08/02/000094946_02072209183311/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf.
• Kikeri, S., Nellis, J. and Shirley, M. (1994) `Privatization: Lessons from Market Economies', The World Bank Research Observer 9(2): 241—72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Knight-John, M. (2004) `Privatization and Regulation', in S. Kelegama (ed.) Economic Policy in Sri Lanka: Issues and Debates, pp. 363—78. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• Knight-John, M., Jayasinghe, S. and Perumal, A. (2004) Paper No. 74 `Regulatory Impact Assessment in Sri Lanka: The Bridges that have to be Crossed', Working Paper Series. Manchester: Centre on Regulation and Competition, University of Manchester archived at www.competition-regulation.org.uk/publications/working_papers/WP74.pdf.
• Lee, C. (2002) `Telecommunications Reforms in Malaysia', Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 73(4): 521—40.[CrossRef]
• Miller, A.N. (1997) `Ideological Motivations of Privatization in Great Britain versus Developing Countries', Journal of International Affairs 50(2): 391—407.
• Musgrave, R.A. and Musgrave, P.B. (1989) Public Finance in Theory and Practice. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
• Parker, D. and Kirkpatrick, C. (2005) `Privatization in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence and the Policy Lessons', The Journal of Development Studies 41(4): 513—41.[CrossRef]
• Piesse, J. (undated) `Privatization and the Role of Public and Private Institutions in Restructuring Programmes', archived at www.enterprise_impact.org.uk/pdf/privatization/pdf
• Ramasundara, M. (2002) `Regulatory Requirements for the Development of Sri Lanka's Telecommunications Sector', in M. Knight-John (ed.) Competition Policy and Utility Regulation: The Sri Lankan Experience, pp. 76—99. Colombo: Law and Society Trust.
• Ranaraja, S. (2001) `Case Study of Privatized Public Enterprises — Sri Lanka', archived at www.ilo,org/public/english/region/asro/colombo/download/shrprro2.pdf
• Rupasinghe, P.W. (2002) `Competition Law in Sri Lanka', in M. Knight-John (ed.) Competition Policy and Utility Regulation: The Sri Lankan Experience, pp. 44—75. Colombo: Law and Society Trust.
• Sakar, A.E. (2006) `New Public Management in Developing Countries ', International Journal of Public Sector Management 19(2): 180—203.[CrossRef]
• Samarajiva, R. (2000) `The Role of Competition in Institutional Reform of Telecommunications: Lessons from Sri Lanka', Telecommunications Policy 24: 699—717.
• Samarajiva, R. (2002) `Utility Regulation and Competition Policy in Sri Lanka: Prospects for Change', in M. Knight-John (ed.) Competition Policy and Utility Regulation: The Sri Lankan Experience, pp. 1—25. Colombo: Law and Society Trust.
• Samarajiva, R. and Dokeniya, A. (2004) `Regulation and Investment: Sri Lanka Case Study ', in A.K. Mahan and W.H. Melody (eds) Stimulating Investment in Network Development: Roles for Regulators — Report on the World Dialogue on Regulation, pp. 141—75 archived at www.regulateonline.org/content/view/207/65/.
• Samaratunge, R. and Bennington, L. (2002) `New Public Management: Challenge for Sri Lanka', Asian Journal of Public Administration 24(1): 87—109.
• Siyambalapitiya, T. (2002) `Regulation in Sri Lanka's Electric Power Sector ', in M. Knight-John (ed.) Competition Policy and Utility Regulation: The Sri Lankan Experience, pp. 100—18. Colombo: Law and Society Trust.
• Smith, D.A.C., and Trebilcock, M.J. (2001). `State-owned Enterprises in Less Developed Countries: Privatization and Alternative Reform Strategies ', European Journal of Law and Economics 12(3): 217—52.[CrossRef]
• Soeters, J.L. and Tessema, M.T. (2004) `Public Management in Developing Countries: Some Notes on Eritrea', International Review of Administrative Sciences 70(4): 623—35.[Abstract]
• Vickers, J. and Yarrow, G. (1988) Privatization: An Economic Analysis. London: MIT Press.
• World Bank (2000) `Sri Lanka: Recapturing Missed Opportunities', Working Paper Series. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 73, No. 4, 611-628 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0020852307083463


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Balasooriya, A. F. Articles by Coghill, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?