Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Review of Administrative Sciences
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gudergan, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Governance of public—private partnerships: lessons learnt from an Australian case?

Judy Johnston

Judy Johnston, Associate Professor, School of Management, University of Technology, Sydney (UTS), Australia

Siegfried P. Gudergan

School of Marketing, UTS

Large infrastructure public—private partnerships (PPPs) in Australia have revealed significant governance problems. The aim of this research is to examine the technical-rational and social contractual issues of PPPs within the broad context of risk, and accordingly propose a governance framework. The research builds on international PPP literature to develop an analytical conceptualization. It uses document review and interviews to construct a case study of a Cross City Tunnel (CCT) toll-way in Sydney, which became operational in August 2005 and failed in December 2006. The research indicates that failure within this so-called PPP largely occurred within the technical-rational governance system due to unforeseen risks. This led to a breakdown in the social contract, through political risk. A governance system that enhances risk assessment and diminishes the likelihood of negative political behaviours is required.

Points for practitioners

To develop a more considered risk assessment process within the technical-rational environment, negotiation and contractual processes need deeper analysis to identify factors that could affect PPP success or failure. This would involve taking the potential impacts of identified technical-rational and social risk factors through to a logical conclusion for the project and the partners. Furthermore, this research confirms that a basic system of PPP governance needs to encompass behavioural rules, which could include appropriate sanctions and penalties within the contract. Breach of rules could involve mediation but improved PPP governance may be better achieved through an independent, oversight authority.

Key Words: governance • public—private partnerships (PPPs) • social contract

References

  • AAP (2007) `Banks to Sue Cross City Tunnel Builder', News, 19 March. (accessed via Factiva, 2007).
  • ABC News Online (2006) ` Govt Accused of setting Cross City Tunnel toll', 23 February (www.abc.net; accessed 24 April 2007).
  • ABC News Online (2007) ` Ratings Agency Backs Govt's Handling of Tunnel Project', Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 20 March ( www.abc.net.au; accessed 29 March 2007).
  • Audit Office of NSW (2006) Performance Reports — 2006 — Cross City Tunnel Project — Executive Summary.
  • Australian Procurement and Construction Council (Inc.) (APCC) (2002) Discussion Paper: `Key Issues in Procurement through Public Private Partnerships (PPPs)'. Canberra: ACT.
  • Baker, J. (2007) `More to do so wait until the election', Sydney Morning Herald 23 February (www.smh.com.au/text/articles; accessed 5 March 2007).
  • Barratt, P. (Auditor-General for Australia) (2003) `Public—Private Partnerships — Are there Gaps in Public Sector Accountability?' Paper presented at 2002 Australasian Council of Public Accounts Committees, Melbourne, February.
  • Bloomfield, P. (2006) `The Challenging Business of Long-term Public—Private Partnerships: Reflections on Local Experience', Public Administration Review 66(3): 400—12.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bovaird, T. (2004a) `Public—Private Partnerships in Western Europe and the US: New Growths from Old Roots', in A. Ghobadin, D. Gallear, N. O'Regan and H. Viney (eds) Public—Private Partnerships, pp. 221—50. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bovaird, T. (2004b) `Public—Private Partnerships: From Contested Concepts to Prevalent Practice', International Review of Administrative Sciences 70(2): 199—215.[Abstract]
  • Brinkerhoff, J. (2002) `Partnership as a Social Network Mediator for Resolving Global Conflict: The Case of the World Commission on Dams', International Journal of Public Administration 25(11): 1281—310.[CrossRef]
  • Brinkerhoff, D. and Brinkerhoff, J. (2004) `Partnerships between International Donors and Non-governmental Development Organizations: Opportunities and Constraints ', International Review of Administrative Sciences 70(2): 253—70.[Abstract]
  • Brown, T. and Pitoski, M. (2003) `Managing Contract Performance: A Transaction Costs Approach', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22(2): 275—97.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Dawes, A., Chemell, A. and Cubby, B. (2006) `Tunnel boss feels Premier's road rage', The Sydney Morning Herald 11 February ( www.smh.com.au/news; accessed 24 April 2007).
  • Demirag, I., Dubnick, M. and Khadaroo, M.I. (2004) `A Framework for Examining Accountability and Value for Money in the UK's Private Finance Initiative', The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 15(Autumn): 69—83.
  • Diamond, J. (2006) `Au Revoir to Partnership: What's Next?', The International Journal of Public Sector Management 19(3): 278—86.[CrossRef]
  • Edwards, P. and Bowen, P. (2003) `Risk Perception and Communication in Public—Private Partnerships', in A. Akintoye, M. Beck and C. Hardcastle (eds) Public—Private Partnerships, pp. 79—92. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Edwards, P. and Shaoul, J. (2002) `Partnerships: For Better, For Worse?', Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 16(3): 397—421.
  • Four Corners (2006) `Program on Public Private Partnerships' (Fullerton-Mulligan Interview), ABC Television, Australia, 20 February.
  • Friend, J. (2006) `Partnership Meets Politics: Managing within the Maze', The International Journal of Public Sector Management 19(3): 261—77.[CrossRef]
  • Greve, C. and Hodge, G. (2005) `Public—Private Partnerships: A Policy for All Seasons', in G. Hodge and C. Greve The Challenge of Public—Private Partnerships, pp. 332—49. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Haque, M.S. (2004) `Governance Based on Partnership with NGOs: Implications for Development and Empowerment in Rural Bangladesh', International Review of Administrative Sciences 70(2): 271—90.[Abstract]
  • Hardcastle, C. and Boothroyd, K. (2003) `Risks Overview in Public—Private Partnership ', in A. Akintoye, M. Beck and C. Hardcastle (eds) Public—Private Partnerships, pp. 31—57. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hodge, G. (2004) `The Risky Business of Public—Private Partnerships ', Australian Journal of Public Administration 63(4): 37—49.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hofmeister, A. and Borchert, H. (2004) `Public—Private Partnerships in Switzerland: Crossing the Bridge with the Aid of a New Governance Approach', International Review of Administrative Sciences 70(2): 217—32.[Abstract]
  • Infrastructure Implementation Group (IIG) ( 2005) Review of Future Provision of Motorways in NSW. The Premier's Department, NSW Government.
  • Legislative Assembly (2005) ` Public Accounts Committee Review of the Cross City Tunnel'. NSW Parliament.
  • Linder, S. (2000) `Coming to Terms with Public—Private Partnership ', in P. Rosenau (ed.) Public—Private Policy Partnerships, pp. 19—35. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Lowndes, V. and Skelcher, C. (1998) `The Dynamics of Multi-organizational Partnerships: An Analysis of Changing Modes of Governance', Public Administration 76(2): 313—33.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • NSW Treasury (2006) `Working with Government — Guidelines for Privately Financed Projects'. NSW Government.
  • Parliament of NSW (2006) Cross City Tunnel. Sydney: Government of NSW.
  • Pollitt, C. (2003) The Essential Public Manager. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Reuters (2007) ` S & P releases report on Australian PPPs', 20 March (accessed via Factiva, 2007). RTA ( 2003) Cross City Tunnel: Summary of Contracts. Sydney: Government of NSW.
  • Rwelamila, P. Chege, L. and Manchidi, T. (2003) `Public—Private Partnership in South African Local Authorities: Risks and Opportunities', in A. Akintoye, M. Beck and C. Hardcastle (eds) Public—Private Partnerships, pp. 301—15. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Sadran, P. (2004) `Public—Private Partnership in France: A Polymorphous and Unacknowledged Category of Public Policy', International Review of Administrative Sciences 70(2): 233—51.[Abstract]
  • Scott, S. (2007) `Call to tighten rules on PPPs', Australian Financial Review 21 March: 14 (accessed via Factiva, 2007).
  • Simon, H. (1964) 'Theories of Bounded Rationality', CIP Working Paper No. 66, 12 March; accessed at diva.library.cmu.edu.
  • Teisman, G. and Klijn, E.-H. (2002) `Partnership Arrangements: Governmental Rhetoric or Governance Scheme?', Public Administration Review 62(2): 197—205.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Trim, P. (2001) `Public—Private Partnerships in the Defence Industry and the Extended Corporate Intelligence and National Security Model ', Strategic Change 10: 49—58.[CrossRef]
  • Weick, K. (2001) Making Sense of the Organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Weihe, G. (2006) `Public Private Partnerships: Addressing a Nebulous Concept', 10th International Research Symposium on Public Management, Glasgow.
  • Wettenhall, R. (2003) `The Rhetoric and Reality of Public—Private Partnerships', Public Organization Review 3(1): 77—107.[CrossRef]

International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 73, No. 4, 569-582 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0020852307083459


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gudergan, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?