This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brewer, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Citizen or customer? Complaints handling in the public sector

Department of Public and Social Administration, City University of Hong Kong

Ensuring that public service complaints are handled effectively and rights of redress upheld is an integral feature of good governance and effective service delivery. A review of the academic literature and a number of key government reports reveals what citizen complaint and redress systems exist currently, how they can be designed and enabled to operate with the greatest positive impact, and why they are important in holding public officials accountable for the use of discretionary decision-making authority. With the development of new public management (NPM) and public sector reforms in many jurisdictions, a consumerist model for handling complaints has come increasingly to the fore. When combined with the traditional citizenship perspective, this would appear to have considerable potential for improving complaints handling and redress. However, the consumerist model's narrow focus on customer satisfaction and the risk of weakening citizenship values such as fairness and social justice suggest a cautious approach may be best. Public sector managers and professionals need an awareness of how public reform strategies oriented exclusively towards a strengthened consumer role do risk undermining important aspects of the complaints handling and redress strategies embedded in the `rule of law' and `due process' features of citizen-oriented public administration. Accountability may be weakened when service recipients are defined less in terms of their citizenship and more on the basis of a narrowly defined status as a marketplace consumer. This is a key implication of current trends by governments to rely increasingly on privatization, contracting-out and public—private partnerships to deliver services.

Points for practitioners

How well service complaints are handled is a key determinant of quality in the public services at both systemic and service-recipient levels. Procedures that are easily accessible, simple to invoke and operate, transparent, ensure stakeholders are kept informed, and sensitive to different social groups help build confidence in complaints handling and redress processes. However, as more public services are delivered by quasi-public and private organizations using contracting and subcontracting arrangements, the challenge facing practitioners is how to ensure that citizen-centric values are maintained even as external review agencies like the Ombudsman and traditional accountability promoting procedures are replaced by narrower consumerist-oriented approaches.

Key Words: citizenship • complaints handling • consumerism • public management • redress

References

• Aberbach, J. and Christensen, T. (2005) `Citizens and Consumers: An NPM Dilemma', Public Management Review 7(2): 225—45.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Aldons, M. (2001) `Responsible, Representative and Accountable Government ', Australian Journal of Public Administration 60(1): 34—42.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Bovins, M. (2005) `Public Accountability', in Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. Jr and Pollitt, C. (eds) The Handbook of Public Management, pp. 182—208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Burall, S. and Neligan, C. (2005) `The Accountability of International Organizations ', Berlin: Global Policy Institute, http://www.globalpublicpolicy.net (accessed 21 February 2007).
• Carroll, J.D. (1995) `The Rhetoric of Reform and Political Reality in the National Performance Review', Public Administration Review 55(3): 302—12.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Cinca, C.C., Molinero, C.M. and Queiroz, A.B. (2003) `The Measurement of Intangible Assets in Public Sector using Scaling Techniques', Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(2): 249—75.[CrossRef]
• Clark, H. (2005) Address to 22nd Australasian and Pacific Region Ombudsmen's Conference. Legislative Chamber, Parliament, Wellington, New Zealand, http://www.ombudsmen.govt.nz/APOR%20docs/Helen%20Clark.pdf (accessed 29 September 2006).
• de Las Casas, L. (2005) Complaint and Redress Mechanisms in International Organizations: Background Research for the Complaint and Redress Dimension. Global Accountability Project, One World Trust. http://www.oneworldtrust.org (accessed 20 February 2007).
• Diamandouros, P.N. (2005) `The Role of the Ombudsman in Future Europe and the Mandates of Ombudsmen in Future Europe', The European Ombudsman Speech. Copenhagen, 31 March 2005, http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/speeches/en/2005—03—31.htm (accessed 1 February 2007).
• Fountain, J. (2001) `Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service', Governance 14(1): 55—73.[CrossRef]
• Government of India (2006) Department of Administrative Reforms & Public Grievance, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions Grievance Redress Mechanisms in Government, http://darpg.nic.in/arpg-website/ReportsAndPublication/PublicGrievanceRedress.asp (accessed 20 July 2006).
• Haque, M.S. (2000) `Significance of Accountability under the New Approach to Public Governance', International Review of Administrative Sciences 66: 599—617.[Free Full Text]
• Haque, M.S. (2001) `Pride and Performance in the Public Service: Three Asian Cases', International Review of Administrative Sciences 67: 99—115.[Free Full Text]
• Hirschman, A. (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organisations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Hood, C. (1991) `A Public Management for All Seasons', Public Administration 69(1): 3—19.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Kettl, D.F. (2005) The Global Public Management Revolution (2nd edn). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
• Mulgan, R. (2000) `Comparing Accountability in the Public and Private Sectors',Australian Journal of Public Administration 59(1): 87—97.
• National Audit Office (NAO) Government of the United Kingdom (2005) Citizen Redress: What Citizens Can Do if Things Go Wrong with Public Services. London: The Stationery Office.
• Nel, D., Athron, T., Pitt, L.F. and Ewing, M.T. (2000) `Customer Evaluations for Service Complaint Experiences in the Public Sector', Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 7(3): 3—30.
• Northern Ireland Executive (2005) ` Views on Public Services', http://www.rpani.gov.uk/publicsectorstaff/results.htm (accessed 4 September 2006).
• Office of the Ombudsman, Government of Hong Kong (1998) Effective Complaints Handling: A Tool for Better Serving the Community. Hong Kong: Printing Department.
• One World Trust (2006) `The GAP Framework Complaint and Redress Dimension', http://www.oneworldtrust.org (accessed 24 July 2006).
• Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. and Zeithami, V. (1991) `Understanding Customer Expectations of Service ', Sloan Management Review 32(3): 39—48.
• Peterson, C., Fong, J. and Rush, G. (2003) Investigation and Conciliation of Discrimination Complaints in Hong Kong: Statistical Analysis of 451 Complaint Files and Commentary. Hong Kong: Centre for Comparative and Public Law, Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong.
• Potter, J. (1988) `Consumerism and the Public Sector: How Well Does the Coat Fit?' Public Administration 66(2): 149—64.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Privacy Commissioner, Hong Kong (2006 ), http://www.pcpd.org.hk/textonly/english/infocentre/press_20061026b.html (accessed 8 January 2007).
• Scott, I. (2005) Public Administration in Hong Kong: Regime Change and Its Impact on the Public Sector. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International.
• Smith, G. (2005) `A Most Enduring Problem: Police Complaints Reform in England and Wales', Journal of Social Policy 35(1): 121—41.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• South China Morning Post (various editions in March/April 2006).
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2005) Unlocking the Human Potential for Public Sector Performance: World Public Sector Report 2005 (ST/ESA/PAD/SER.E/63). United Nations: New York.
• Vincent-Jones, P. (2005) `Citizen Redress in Public Contracting for Human Services', Modern Law Review 68(6): 887—924.[CrossRef]

International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 73, No. 4, 549-556 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0020852307083457


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brewer, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?