|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 72, No. 4,
459-472 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0020852306070077
© 2006 International Institute of Administrative Sciences
Better public sector governance through partnership with the private sector and civil society: the case of Guatemala’s forest administration
Regina Birner
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Heidi Wittmer
Centre for Environmental Research UFZ, Leipzig, Germany, Working Group on Governance, Institutions and Policy for the Sustainable Use of Landscapes
Improving public sector governance is an important challenge for developing countries. Taking the case of Guatemala’s forest administration, the Instituto Nacional de Bosque (INAB), as an example, this article analyses an innovative option for public sector reform: the delegation of authority to an independent agency that is jointly managed by professionals from the public sector, the private sector and civil society. The article develops an analytical framework, based on transaction cost economics and politics. The analysis shows that delegation and partnership have considerable potential to reduce political interest capture, but they involve potential problems of ‘delegatee drift’ and ‘legitimacy drift’. In view of this trade-off, the comparative advantage of delegation and partnership is influenced by the level of organization among the stakeholders, their managerial capacity and the degree to which they share common interests. The article also discusses the political dimension of the reform process that led to the creation of the INAB.
Key Words: collaborative governance • delegation • forest management • Guatemala • public administration • transaction costs
References
- Ackerman, John M. (2004) ‘Co-governance for Accountability: Beyond ‘Exit’ and "Voice"’ , World Development 32(3): 447-463 .[CrossRef]
- Birner, Regina and Wittmer, Heidi (2004) ‘On the Efficient Boundaries of the State—The Contribution of Transaction Costs Economics to the Analysis of Decentralisation and Devolution in Natural Resource Management’ , Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 22(5): 667-685 .[CrossRef]
- Castaneda, Luis and Umans, Laurent (2004) ‘Mobilising Actors and Merging Interests: Guatemala’s Forestry Sector’ , Capacity.org 20: 2-3 .
- Dixit, Avinash K. (1996) The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-cost Politics Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
- Epstein, David and O’Halloran, Sharyn (1999) Delegating Powers—A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
- Ferroukhi, Lyès and Echeverria, Ronald (2003) ‘Decentralized Forest Polices in Guatemala’, in L. Ferroukhi (ed.) Municipal Forest Management in Latin America, pp. 89-112. Costa Rica: CIFOR, IDRC .
- Frederickson, H. George and Smith, Keven B. (2003) The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
- Garrelts, Heiko, Birner, Regina and Wittmer, Heidi (2005) ‘Policy-windows for the Declaration of Protected Areas—A Comparative Case Study of East Germany and Guatemala’, in Rainer Marggraf, Heiko Garrelts, Michael Markussen and Susanne Menzel (eds) Valuation and Conservation of Biodiversity—Interdisciplinary Views on the Convention on Biological Diversity, pp. 65-83. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer Verlag .
- INAB (2003) Boletín de Estadística Forestal. Adminstracíon del INAB. Guatemala. Online at: http://www.inab.gob.gt.
- Kaufmann, Daniel (2003) ‘Rethinking Governance: The Empirical Lessons Challenge Orthodoxy’, World Bank Discussion Draft. Washington, DC: World Bank .
- Kingdon, John W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown .
- Levi, Brian (2004) ‘Governance and Economic Development in Africa: Meeting the Challenge of Capacity Building’, in Brian Levi and Sahr Kpundeh (eds) Building State Capacity in Africa: New Approaches, Emerging Lessons, pp. 1-42. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute .
- Lynn, Laurence E. Jr., Heinrich, Carolyn, J. and Hill, Carolyn (2001) Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press .
- Mann, Stefan (2000) ‘Transaktionskosten landwirtschaftlicher Investitionsförderung—Ein komparativer Ansatz’ [Transaction costs of agricultural investment promotion—a comparative analysis] , Agrarwirtschaft 94(7): 259-269 .
- Mburu, John and Birner, Regina (2002) ‘Analyzing the Efficiency of Collaborative Wildlife Management: The Case of Two Community Wildlife Sanctuaries in Kenya’ , Journal of Organizational Theory and Behaviour 5(3&4): 359-394 .
- Murdock, Alex (2004) ‘Stakeholder Theory, Partnerships and Alliances in the Health Care Sector of the UK and Scotland’ , International Public Management Review 5(1). Online at http://www.ipmr.net.
- Rivera, William M. and Alex, Gary (2004) ‘The Continuing Role of the Public Sector in Pluralistic Extension Systems’ . Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 11(3): 41-52 .
- Voigt, Stefan and Salzberger, Eli (2002) ‘Choosing not to Choose: When Politicians Choose To Delegate Power’ , Kyklos 55(2): 289-310 .[CrossRef]
- Williamson, Oliver E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism—Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: The Free Press .
- Williamson, Oliver E. (1991) ‘Comparative Economic Organization—The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives’ , Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 269-296 .[CrossRef][ISI]
- Williamson, Oliver E. (1999) ‘Public and Private Bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective’ , Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15(1): 306-341 .[Abstract]
- Wolfensohn, James D. and Bourguignon, François (2004) ‘Development and Poverty Reduction -Looking Back, Looking Ahead’ , Paper prepared for the 2004 Meetings of the World Bank and IMF, October. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
