Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Review of Administrative Sciences
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lægreid, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reform of the employment and welfare administrations — the challenges of co-coordinating diverse public organizations

Tom Christensen

University of Oslo, Norway

Anne Lise Fimreite

University of Bergen, Norway

Per Lægreid

University of Bergen, Norway

This article addresses one of the most comprehensive structural reforms in recent Norwegian administrative history: a merger of the employment and national insurance administrations, combined with more formal collaboration with the local government social services administration. The reform can be seen as a 'whole-of-government' initiative intended to increase the cocoordinative capacity of government to address `wicked problems' cutting across existing policy areas and government levels in a multi-level governance system. This article examines the following questions: First, what characterizes the organizational thinking related to this reform? Second, how can we understand the reform process in terms of a transformative perspective combining instrumental, cultural and environmental features? Third, what are the potential effects and implications of the new structure for political control and institutional autonomy, for relations between central and local administrations, and for the main goals stated? The theory base for the analyses is a transformative approach.

Key Words: control and autonomy • coordination • joined-up-government • multi-level governance • post-NPM reforms • transformative perspective • welfare administration • whole-of-government

International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 73, No. 3, 389-408 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0020852307081149


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
G. P. Martin, G. Currie, and R. Finn
Leadership, Service Reform, and Public-Service Networks: The Case of Cancer-Genetics Pilots in the English NHS
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2009; 19(4): 769 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]