Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Review of Administrative Sciences
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frison-Roche, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sodev, S.-D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The issues involved in the reform of the Bulgarian judicial system

François Frison-Roche

Research Centre in Administrative Science, Université de Paris 2 (Paris University).

Spas-Dimitrov Sodev

Université de Paris XII (Paris University).

The reform of the judicial systems of the post-Communist European countries has been and still is one of the essential criteria for admission to the European Union. These reforms have proved to be more long-drawn-out and more difficult than could be expected and the case of Bulgaria, in 2005, is no exception to this. This article presents, on the one hand, the legislative and constitutional aspects of the reform of the Bulgarian judicial system and, on the other, the historic and political context. It shows that the introduction of the democratic principle of the separation and independence of the judiciary can have certain negative consequences for the workings of the judicial system, now subject to the control of a body emanating from it, the Higher Judicial Council, which is too corporatist to exercise that effective self-regulation which would make it possible to eliminate the endemic politicization and corruption of the magistrates. It also shows the distinction that must be made and must be accepted between the independence of the judiciary in the exercising of its judicial functions and the necessity of introducing hierarchical regulation, by administrative means, of the effective functioning of the judicial system and the management of its resources.

International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 71, No. 4, 593-606 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0020852305059600


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?