Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Review of Administrative Sciences
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kakabadse, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kakabadse, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Developing Reflexive Practitioners through Collaborative Inquiry: A Case Study of the UK Civil Service

Nada K. Kakabadse

University College Northampton

Andrew Kakabadse

Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Bedford, England

This article examines how a collaborative inquiry (ci) intervention has been effectively used to enhance change within central government organizations. The experience and learning from a 15-month ci process with a group of 12 senior managers from various departments/agencies within the UK civil service, is presented. The purpose of the inquiry was to assist public servants to meaningfully promote the ‘Modernizing Government’ agenda. Various participatory forms of inquiry and discourse dedicated to grasping cultural meaning from within the public service are explored as well as the requirements necessary for the creation of meaningful change. This article illustrates how harnessing diverse opinions through mutual inquiry can be a more fruitful form of pursuing change than the top-down rational approach or the more confrontational rhetorical models of debate. It concludes that the collaborative qualities of participation and democratic dialogue are especially pertinent to individual and organizational development as emphasis is placed on the contextual relevance of experiential knowledge, group and community development and the need to involve all participants in the task of defining the aims of change and creating meaningful futures. The impact of this inquiry is now being positively felt within the UK’s civil service as the members of the inquiry community apply their learning within their own departments.

International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 69, No. 3, 365-383 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0020852303693005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?